Thomas Purvis, represents the original hinds of the Barkers of Earsdon, with a farm held in 1649 by John Preston of Newcastle, whose daughter and heiress, Ann Preston, married Charles Dalston of the same town. On July 1 6th, 1741, being then 'an old man waiting his change, when, where and how it should attend him,' Charles Dalston made his will, bequeathing his copyhold farm at Earsdon to his daughters, Christiana Dalston, and Ann, wife of Joseph Barker of Earsdon, to be equally divided between them. The elder daughter subsequently married Edward Barrow of South Blyth, but died without issue, whereupon the whole of Charles Dalston's farm came to Christopher Barker of Earsdon.'
'Charles Dalston, son of John Dalston of Acorn bank in Westmorland (see Hodgson, Northumberland, pt. ii. vol. ii. p. 354), was apprenticed on August 1st, 1677, to William HUNTLEY of Newcastle, mercer. He was admitted free of the Merchants' Company, October 17th, 1687; was disfranchised for disobedience to the governor of the company, January 22nd, 1730, and was restored on August 1 8th of the same, year. On October i8th, 1687, he married, at Long Benton, .^nn, daughter of John Preston. She was buried in Earsdon church on July 8th, 1716. He died on June 25th, 1742, having survived all his children except two daughters ; (i) Christiana, who was baptised January 2ist, 1700/1 ; married April 2nd, 1744, Edward Barrow of South Blyth; and was buried at Earsdon, February 6th, 1769 ; and (2) Ann, who was baptised November 14th, 1708 ; married, November 2olh, 1729, Joseph Barker of Earsdon, and was buried November 8th, 1760. Earsdon Registers, and Dendy, Merchant Adventurers.
SOURCE: https://www.archive.org/stream/historyofnorthum09nort/historyofnorthum09nort_djvu.txt
Wednesday, September 14, 2011
The Manor of Huntley
Transactions - Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society (Volume 13)
. (page 31 of 44)14. John de Monmouth is assessed for two fees in No. 4,
one of which, we are told in No. 5, in Tyberton, was held by John
Juvenis, the other in Hope, by John de Monmouth himself.
John " Juvenis " no doubt was the son who succeeded John
" Senior " in 32nd Henry III., and on whose death, in 40th
Hen. III., the Honour of Monmouth, in consequence of his con-
tumacy, was given to Prince Edward, his other manors only being
inherited by his daughters. Neither in the above Returns, nor in
No. 6, is any notice taken of the Manor of Huntley, which in
1210 was said to be in the Barony (Return I, No. 14). Fosbroke
suggests that it may have been ere this alienated to the Huntley
family, but if so, why were they not called on to pay aid for it.
SOURCE: http://www.ebooksread.com/authors-eng/bristol-and-gloucestershire-archaeological-society/transactions---bristol-and-gloucestershire-archaeological-society-volume-13-sir/page-31-transactions---bristol-and-gloucestershire-archaeological-society-volume-13-sir.shtml
Jane Ragland-Huntley, Cardiff
Cardiff records; being materials for a history of the county borough from the earliest times (Volume 2)
. (page 23 of 38)Indenture dated 6 September anno 12 Eliz. (1570), between William Herbert of Cardif, esq., and John Myvon of Mere in the county of Wiltes, gent', of the one part and Thomas Carne of Ewenny, esq., of the other part. Reciting Bargain and Sale by the said Thomas Carne to the said William Herbert and John Dodington of the manor of Little Nash, otherwise called S' Osmond's Aishe, in the parish of Nashe in the county of Glamorgan, together with all other his messuages, lands, advowsons &c (with certain exceptions)
in Lekewith, Dennis Powes, Cogan &c, or within the franchises or parishes of Cardiff and Routh. It is witnessed that the parties hereto of the first part do grant the said premises unto the said Thomas Carne and the heirs of his body, with the following remainders in succession : —
To John Ragland, son of Sir Thomas Ragland, knight, in tail
male. Then to the following sisters of the said Thomas
Ragland, in tail male.
Cicell, wife of John Ogans, esq.
Barbara, wife of Robert Longe, esq.
Jane Huntley, widow.
Mary, wife of John Palmer, gent'.
Then to our Sovereign Lady the Queen's Majesty, her heirs and
successors for ever.
This is upon condition that the said Thomas Carne do pay unto the
said William Herbert and John Dodington twenty shillings to the
use of our said sovereign lady the Queen.
Deed Poll. Appointment by William Gerrard, esq., Justice of
the Court of Great Sessions, of John Tyttleye, esq., to be his true
and lawful Deputy in the said office.
SOURCE: http://www.ebooksread.com/authors-eng/wales-records-committee-cardiff/cardiff-records-being-materials-for-a-history-of-the-county-borough-from-the-ea-dra/page-23-cardiff-records-being-materials-for-a-history-of-the-county-borough-from-the-ea-dra.shtml
Robert de Huntele, Shropshire
WUDECOT v LANGFORD. PRS xiv. 14; RCR i. 126 (1193-5)
Cited Bailey, CLl ix, 202, n. 79, 206, n. 108, 208, n. 118.
Robert of Woodcote, a substantial landholder [R.W. Eyton,
Antiquities of Shropshire, vii (1858) 335; ix (1859), 11 sq., 17.]
seems to have been successfully sued in novel disseisin at the
Shropshire eyre of 11191 by one Robert de Huntele or Huntiland. Both of
them may have sought to hold of Eva de Langford, an heiress in her own
right. Some years later, seven of the recognitors could not remember
whom she had warranted.
Robert of Woodcote sought his exchange from Eva, apparently by
Warantia Carte, at the Shropshire eyre of 1193. Eva, no doubt advised
by her new second husband Walter of Wheatfield, brother to a royal
justice, had the case put to a jury, for which she paid a mark. [Pipe
Roll 1 ~i£hard 1, 112; cf. R~ ~ 1 Richard 1, 152, 254.1 The case
was adjourned to Westminster, where Walter, on his wife's behalf
"petit breve per quod implacitatur". If this means that he sought a
sight of the original writ, it suggests that Warantia Carte was not
yet a routine action. In the absence of a verdict, Eyton conjectured
that Woodcote won his case, Eyton, viii (1859), 101-8 etc. Certainly,
the Woodcotes were holding of Eva by 1208, CRR v. 270, 281.
By 1199 fresh proceedings were under way at Westminster, a
Recordari Facias obtained to question the original assize decision.
have so far been unable to disentangle the subsequent course of this
third case and its connection with the earlier dispute. The main
references noted, and used above, are as follows;- William Salt
Society iii. 501 (Stafford eyre); RCR ii. 239; CRR i. 197, 238, 461;
PK.1 i. 197, 513 0199-1201)
SOURCE: http://authors.library.caltech.edu/19555/1/HumsWP-0116.pdf
Cited Bailey, CLl ix, 202, n. 79, 206, n. 108, 208, n. 118.
Robert of Woodcote, a substantial landholder [R.W. Eyton,
Antiquities of Shropshire, vii (1858) 335; ix (1859), 11 sq., 17.]
seems to have been successfully sued in novel disseisin at the
Shropshire eyre of 11191 by one Robert de Huntele or Huntiland. Both of
them may have sought to hold of Eva de Langford, an heiress in her own
right. Some years later, seven of the recognitors could not remember
whom she had warranted.
Robert of Woodcote sought his exchange from Eva, apparently by
Warantia Carte, at the Shropshire eyre of 1193. Eva, no doubt advised
by her new second husband Walter of Wheatfield, brother to a royal
justice, had the case put to a jury, for which she paid a mark. [Pipe
Roll 1 ~i£hard 1, 112; cf. R~ ~ 1 Richard 1, 152, 254.1 The case
was adjourned to Westminster, where Walter, on his wife's behalf
"petit breve per quod implacitatur". If this means that he sought a
sight of the original writ, it suggests that Warantia Carte was not
yet a routine action. In the absence of a verdict, Eyton conjectured
that Woodcote won his case, Eyton, viii (1859), 101-8 etc. Certainly,
the Woodcotes were holding of Eva by 1208, CRR v. 270, 281.
By 1199 fresh proceedings were under way at Westminster, a
Recordari Facias obtained to question the original assize decision.
have so far been unable to disentangle the subsequent course of this
third case and its connection with the earlier dispute. The main
references noted, and used above, are as follows;- William Salt
Society iii. 501 (Stafford eyre); RCR ii. 239; CRR i. 197, 238, 461;
PK.1 i. 197, 513 0199-1201)
SOURCE: http://authors.library.caltech.edu/19555/1/HumsWP-0116.pdf
John Huntley in South Wales
The Visitation of South Wales & Herefordshire, William Fellow 1531
[Source: Published in Visitations by the Heralds in Wales, M P Siddons, 1996]p36 Huntley of Hadnock
This pedigree includes a John (Huntley), who married Anne, "doughter to Henry ap Gryffyth [4] of Harforeshyrr, and had yssue Heugh, William, Elysabeth, Blanche and Jane"The note [4] states that this was probably Harry ap Gruffudd Parry of New Court, Bacton, HER.(WG2, Drymbenog 12 (B1)).
SOURCE: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/im.griffiths/parryfamilyhistory/parrytrees/gvstart.htm#1531
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Richard Huntelegh, 1382
The National Archives has:
Miscellaneous deeds DD\WY/7/Z1a n.d. c.1290-1536
21 doc
Contents:
Miscellaneous deeds DD\WY/7/Z1a n.d. c.1290-1536
21 doc
Contents:
Nether and Over Atobere (Adbere) and Homere(Hummer), Trent (involving the Bishop of Bath and Wells, Jn., son of Roger Hayewell and Rich.Huntelegh, 1382 (personal seal only); Bishops' licence for Williton chapel, 1499; DEVON: grant of a boundary (abunde) between houses of Matilda de 1a Rewe and Hen.Hatman de Maresch n.d. c.1290; Taw and Rechemershe in the Manor of Winkleigh, n.d. c.1320-1396/7 [& MTD Z1b/9, Y1/S, F2/4, 8].
Land in Swetton, 1325; Colverhole by Sanford n.d.c.1310; bonds, etc. 1324-1536. (straw wreath entwined seal, 1396/7).
Land in Swetton, 1325; Colverhole by Sanford n.d.c.1310; bonds, etc. 1324-1536. (straw wreath entwined seal, 1396/7).
Church of Huntelegh
Rioters and Ruffians? The Dunheved Gang (Part 2)
William de Roscele, parson of the church of Huntele [William de Roscele, persone de l'eglise de Huntele]
'William Russell' in modern spelling. On 11 December 1323, "William de Roscele, parson of the church of Huntelegh" was accused with many other men of assaulting a man named Richard de Portes in Gloucester and stealing his goods. So he was probably an aggressive, fighting kind of priest, and one not too bothered about breaking the law! Richard de Portes was an associate of Thomas, Lord Berkeley, John Maltravers and Thomas Gurney.
Huntley is a village seven miles to the west of Gloucester, about twenty-five miles from Berkeley. However, William was probably already a member of the gang before Edward was taken to Berkeley, as two orders for his arrest appear on 8 March: one for breaking into a house, and cutting down trees, in Berkshire, and the other for the same offence in Wiltshire. No mean feat, to be in Berkshire and Wiltshire at the same time, and all the manors mentioned are pretty far from his parish.
It's possible that the gang made use of Huntley as a useful base not far from Berkeley, or as a meeting point. It's on the edge of the Forest of Dean, a very handy place to hide. Huntley church was built in the eleventh century, but demolished and rebuilt in 1861. Only the tower is as it would have been in William's day.
SOURCE: http://www.everythingedward2.com/articles/dunheved_gang_2.html
William de Roscele, parson of the church of Huntele [William de Roscele, persone de l'eglise de Huntele]
'William Russell' in modern spelling. On 11 December 1323, "William de Roscele, parson of the church of Huntelegh" was accused with many other men of assaulting a man named Richard de Portes in Gloucester and stealing his goods. So he was probably an aggressive, fighting kind of priest, and one not too bothered about breaking the law! Richard de Portes was an associate of Thomas, Lord Berkeley, John Maltravers and Thomas Gurney.
Huntley is a village seven miles to the west of Gloucester, about twenty-five miles from Berkeley. However, William was probably already a member of the gang before Edward was taken to Berkeley, as two orders for his arrest appear on 8 March: one for breaking into a house, and cutting down trees, in Berkshire, and the other for the same offence in Wiltshire. No mean feat, to be in Berkshire and Wiltshire at the same time, and all the manors mentioned are pretty far from his parish.
It's possible that the gang made use of Huntley as a useful base not far from Berkeley, or as a meeting point. It's on the edge of the Forest of Dean, a very handy place to hide. Huntley church was built in the eleventh century, but demolished and rebuilt in 1861. Only the tower is as it would have been in William's day.
SOURCE: http://www.everythingedward2.com/articles/dunheved_gang_2.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)